John Spaulding v. J. Streeval
John Spaulding v. J. Streeval
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6042
JOHN MARTIN SPAULDING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00118-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Martin Spaulding, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6042 Doc: 15 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John Martin Spaulding, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition, in which Spaulding sought
to challenge his convictions and sentence by way of the savings clause in
28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his conviction and sentence in a petition
for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 only if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate
or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision
in Jones v. Hendrix,
599 U.S. 465, 477-80(2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241
petition to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction or sentence),
we conclude that the district court correctly determined that Spaulding cannot pursue his
claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Spaulding
v. Streeval, No. 7:22-cv-00118-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished