In re: David Stebbins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: David Stebbins

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1740 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1740

In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. (2:24-cv-00140)

Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Stebbins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1740 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

David A. Stebbins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court

has unduly delayed in ruling on Stebbins’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and

motion for CM/ECF access, and in conducting a review, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

, of

the sufficiency of Stebbins’ complaint filed in the underlying action. Stebbins seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal

undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished