U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

In re: David Stebbins

In re: David Stebbins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 24, 2024

In re: David Stebbins

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1740 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1740

In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. (2:24-cv-00140)

Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Stebbins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1740 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: David A. Stebbins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on Stebbins’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and motion for CM/ECF access, and in conducting a review, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, of the sufficiency of Stebbins’ complaint filed in the underlying action. Stebbins seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.