U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

Randy Golden v. William Bailey

Randy Golden v. William Bailey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 2024

Randy Golden v. William Bailey

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6699 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6699

RANDY D. GOLDEN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WILLIAM BAILEY, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:24-cv-00656-JKB)

Submitted: September 24, 2024 Decided: October 1, 2024

Before KING, WYNN, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy D. Golden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6699 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Randy D. Golden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to rescind its order granting Respondent a second extension to respond to Golden’s 28 U.S.C.§ 2254 petition, denying his motion to stay his state court proceedings, and granting Respondent’s third motion for extension of time to respond to Golden’s § 2254 petition.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Upon review, the order Golden seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.