Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County
Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1495
RAYMOND ROMIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01475)
Submitted: September 13, 2024 Decided: October 3, 2024
Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: John M. Shoreman, MCFADDEN & SHOREMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John P. Markovs, County Attorney, Edward B. Lattner, Deputy County Attorney, Matthew H. Johnson, Associate County Attorney, Erin J. Ashbarry, Associate County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Romig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Romig v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:21-cv-01475-TDC
(D. Md. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished