Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Raymond Romig v. Montgomery County

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1495

RAYMOND ROMIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01475)

Submitted: September 13, 2024 Decided: October 3, 2024

Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: John M. Shoreman, MCFADDEN & SHOREMAN, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. John P. Markovs, County Attorney, Edward B. Lattner, Deputy County Attorney, Matthew H. Johnson, Associate County Attorney, Erin J. Ashbarry, Associate County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Romig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. Romig v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:21-cv-01475-TDC

(D. Md. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished