In re: Anthony March

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

In re: Anthony March

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1524 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1524

In re: ANTHONY WAYNE MARCH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:19-cr-00383-M-1)

Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 15, 2024

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Wayne March, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1524 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/15/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Wayne March petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district

court has unduly delayed acting on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion. He seeks an order from

this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals

that the district court denied March’s motion. United States v. March, No. 5:19-cr-00383-

M-1 (E.D.N.C., Jun. 14, 2024). Accordingly, because the district court has decided

March’s case, we deny the motion for the appointment of counsel and deny the mandamus

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished