Robert Smith v. Antonyo Keller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Robert Smith v. Antonyo Keller

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1561 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/18/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1561

ROBERT W. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANTONYO D. KELLER; BIGO LIVE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00524-MHL)

Submitted: September 30, 2024 Decided: October 18, 2024

Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1561 Doc: 7 Filed: 10/18/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his second amended

complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Smith’s informal brief

does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,

775 F.3d 170, 177

(4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished