James Rose v. Bryan Stirling

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Rose v. Bryan Stirling

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6556 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/25/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6556

JAMES R. ROSE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Robert Bryan Harwell, Senior District Judge. (0:23-cv-05261-RBH)

Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Rose, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6556 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/25/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

James R. Rose appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Rose’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint

under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rose v. Stirling, No. 0:23-cv-

05261-RBH (D.S.C. May 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished