James Rose v. Bryan Stirling
James Rose v. Bryan Stirling
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6556 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/25/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6556
JAMES R. ROSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Robert Bryan Harwell, Senior District Judge. (0:23-cv-05261-RBH)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 25, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Rose, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6556 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/25/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James R. Rose appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Rose’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint
under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rose v. Stirling, No. 0:23-cv-
05261-RBH (D.S.C. May 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished