United States v. Shongo Owens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Shongo Owens

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6641 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6641

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHONGO LECARR OWENS, a/k/a G.O., a/k/a Chuck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00468-CCB-1; 1:18-cv-01995-CCB)

Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 21, 2024

Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shongo Lecarr Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6641 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Shongo Lecarr Owens seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on

his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). When, as here, the district

court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that

reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims

debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis,

580 U.S. 100, 115-17

(2017).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owens has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Owens’s motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished