USCA4 Appeal: 24-1527 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1527

HEIDI SAAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAJOR, LINDSEY & AFRICA, LLC; ALLEGIS GROUP, INC., Jointly and Individually, as the owner of Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-02102-JRR)

Submitted: November 19, 2024 Decided: November 21, 2024

Before QUATTLEBAUM, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Heidi Saas, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Catherine Biscoe-Hall, Kraig B. Long, Meredith A. Storm, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1527 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/21/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Heidi Saas appeals the district court’s order construing Defendants’ motion to strike

her complaint or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint, as a motion to dismiss and

granting the motion as to Saas’ multiple civil claims, including her claims for disparate

treatment and disparate impact discrimination, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act,

to 634. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Saas v. Major, Lindsey

& Africa, LLC, No. 1:23-cv-02102-JRR (D. Md. May 10, 2024). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2