USCA4 Appeal: 24-1964 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/09/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1964

KIRK RUSSEL MARSH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF UTAH, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Utah; MICHAEL EDWARDS, State Judge; DANA EMMONS, Court Appointed Reunification Counselor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00516-PTG-IDD)

Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 9, 2024

Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirk Russel Marsh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1964 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/09/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Kirk Russel Marsh appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint

without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman ∗

doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order. Marsh v. Utah, No. 1:24-cv-00516-PTG-IDD (E.D. Va.

Sept. 13, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman,

(1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co.,

(1923).

2