Rashaud Azar El v. Cabarrus County
Rashaud Azar El v. Cabarrus County
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6573 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6573
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL, a/k/a Jerimy Love, a/k/a Jeremy R. Love,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CABARRUS COUNTY; CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL; MIKE DOWNS, Cabarrus County Manager; ANGEL GONZALEZ, Concord Police Department; BROCK VANSCOTER, Cabarrus County Magistrate; DECKSTER BARLOWE, Cabarrus County Magistrate; SHERIFF VAN SHAW, Cabarrus County Sheriff; SET A. ROBERTS, Cabarrus County Deputy; SYDNEY CARTER, District Attorney; CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF; CABARRUS COUNTY COURT,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, Chief District Judge. (1:24-cv-00362-CCE-JLW)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 10, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rashaud Hussein Azar El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6573 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El appeals the district court’s order dismissing Azar El’s
civil complaint without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Azar El’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Azar
El v. Cabarrus Cnty., No. 1:24-cv-00362-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2024). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished