James Vaughter v. R. Vaughn
James Vaughter v. R. Vaughn
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6724 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6724
JAMES R. VAUGHTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT R. VAUGHN; SERGEANT ANDREWS; OFC. MOBLEY; LIEUTENANT ADLAN; JOHN DOE; JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; DR. M.
CLARKE; JANE DOES, Medical Providers/Nurses; MAJOR BOOKER, Chief of Security at SFCC; GONZALEZ, Hearings Officer at SFCC; GARY JONES, Warden at SFCC; TARRA JOHNSON, Chief of Housing at SFCC; T. ROWLEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (2:24-cv-00377-JKW-DEM)
Submitted: December 2, 2024 Decided: December 17, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, QUATTLEBAUM, and BERNER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James R. Vaughter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6724 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: James R. Vaughter seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Vaughter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Vaughter’s request for counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.