John Nelums v. Hutchens Law Firm

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

John Nelums v. Hutchens Law Firm

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1678 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1678

JOHN C. NELUMS; DELMARSHI NELUMS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LLP, a S.C. professional association; PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a FL professional association; CASCADE FUNDING MORTGAGE, a FL professional association; JOHN S. KAY, an individual; JEANETTE MCBRIDE, an individual; JOSEPH STRICKLAND, an individual; SEAN ADEGBOLA, an individual; ASHLEY Z. STANLEY, an individual; ALAN M. STEWART, an individual; SARAH O. LEONARD, an individual; GREGORY WOOTEN, an individual; LOUISE M. JOHNSON, an individual; LPS DEFAULT SOLUTIONS INC.; W. JEFFREY BARNES, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:24-cv-02427-JFA)

Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 23, 2024

Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Calvin Nelums; Delmarshi, H. Nelums, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1678 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

review, Plaintiffs’ complaint seeking a temporary restraining order and

preliminary injunction against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Nelums v. Hutchens

Law Firm, No. 3:24-cv-02427-JFA (D.S.C. July 16, 2024). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished