United States v. Marcus Spencer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Marcus Spencer

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6340 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6340

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARCUS TERRELL SPENCER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (7:18-cr-00853-DCC-1; 7:22-cv- 00942-DCC)

Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 27, 2024

Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Terrell Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. William Jacob Watkins, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6340 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Terrell Spencer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on

his

28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(1)(B). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on the merits,

a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.

Davis,

580 U.S. 100, 115-17

(2017).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Spencer has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished