Miguel Ponce-Arbaiza v. Merrick Garland
Miguel Ponce-Arbaiza v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1012 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/11/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1012
MIGUEL ADALBERTO PONCE-ARBAIZA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: January 11, 2024
Before THACKER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C. Payne, Assistant Director, Kathleen Kelly Volkert, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1012 Doc: 40 Filed: 01/11/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Miguel Adalberto Ponce-Arbaiza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Ponce-Arbaiza’s claims and find no abuse of discretion. See Williams v. Garland, 59 F.4th 620, 632 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See In re Ponce-Arbaiza (B.I.A. Dec. 7, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.