Maria Escobar-Aguinada v. Merrick Garland
Maria Escobar-Aguinada v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1158 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1158
MARIA SANTANA ESCOBAR-AGUINADA,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: January 17, 2024
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Holly M. Smith, Assistant Director, Remi O. Da Rocha-Afodu, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1158 Doc: 20 Filed: 01/17/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Maria Santana Escobar-Aguinada, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the
Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and
Escobar-Aguinada’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see
8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and
that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,
502 U.S. 478, 481(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Escobar-Aguinada
(B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished