Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.
Jermall Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2110
JERMALL BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOCSE MCGUIRE, ESQ.; MARTIN / ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY; MAGISTRATE SUMLIN; JUDGE RUBIN; JUDGE PHILIP JACKSON; JUDGE KENDRA AUSBY; JUDGE J. SCHIFFER; JUDGE MIDDLETON; SPECIAL COUNSEL KIM TAM; JUDGE WILLIAMS.; JUDGE MICHAEL DIPIETRO; JUDGE TANNER; CHAUTAUQUA D. HOOKER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-01317-LKG)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermall Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-2110 Doc: 5 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jermall Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) without prejudice. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Brown v. BOCSE
McGuire, Esq., No. 1:23-cv-01317-LKG (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final order because the district court dismissed the complaint “without granting leave to amend.” Britt v. DeJoy,
45 F.4th 790, 791(4th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (published order).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished