United States v. Bernard Celestine
United States v. Bernard Celestine
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6767 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6767
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BERNARD CELESTINE, a/k/a Speed, a/k/a Beaver, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-D-9)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Celestine, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6767 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/06/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Bernard Celestine appeals the district court’s order denying Celestine’s motions for leave to (1) amend and supplement a previously filed motion for reconsideration of the court’s order granting in part and denying in part Celestine’s motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194; and (2) file a sentencing memorandum supporting a downward departure on the sentences imposed on two of Celestine’s counts of conviction. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Celestine, No. 4:95-cr-00041-D-9 (E.D.N.C. filed June 22, 2023 & entered June 23, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.