Taranvir Singh v. Merrick Garland
Taranvir Singh v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1435 Doc: 29 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1435
TARANVIR SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 20, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024
Before GREGORY, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Inna Lipkin, LAW OFFICE OF INNA LIPKIN, Redwood City, California, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Jeffery R. Leist, Senior Litigation Counsel, Abigail E. Leach, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1435 Doc: 29 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Taranvir Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial
of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed
the record and Singh’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling
contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see
8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and
that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,
502 U.S. 478, 481(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Singh (B.I.A. Apr. 6,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished