U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

Merceda Gooding v. Sykes Enterprise, Incorporated

Merceda Gooding v. Sykes Enterprise, Incorporated
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2024

Merceda Gooding v. Sykes Enterprise, Incorporated

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1292 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1292

MERCEDA D. GOODING, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SYKES ENTERPRISE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:20-cv-03292-PX)

Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Merceda D. Gooding, Appellant Pro Se. Anessa Abrams, FORDHARRISON LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1292 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Merceda D. Gooding appeals the district court’s judgment denying relief on her discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Gooding v. Sykes Enter., Inc., No. 8:20-cv-03292-PX (D. Md. Feb. 15, 2023). We deny Gooding’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.