United States v. Andrew Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Andrew Wilson

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6960 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-cr-00203-BO-1)

Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 27, 2024

Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Scott Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6960 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Scott Wilson appeals the district court’s order ruling on several motions,

including denying Wilson’s motions for compassionate release, brought pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018,

Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603

(b)(1),

132 Stat. 5194

, 5239, and for other miscellaneous relief. After reviewing the

record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilson’s

motions. See, e.g., United States v. Brown,

78 F.4th 122

, 127 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating

standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v.

Wilson, No. 5:21-cr-00203-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 2023). We deny Wilson’s motion for

the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished