U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

Jesse Almendarez v. United States

Jesse Almendarez v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 7, 2024

Jesse Almendarez v. United States

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7410 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/14/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7410

JESSE ALMENDAREZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES; ROBERT J. DODSON; ROBERT J. HIGDON, JR., Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:22-hc-02130-M-RJ)

Submitted: August 10, 2023 Decided: September 14, 2023

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Almendarez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7410 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/14/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jesse Almendarez seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The district court received the notice of appeal after the expiration of the appeal period. Because Almendarez is institutionalized, the notice of appeal is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not conclusively establish when Almendarez deposited the notice of appeal in the institution’s internal mail system. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to make this finding and to determine whether Almendarez timely noted an appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.