Matthew Griffin v. Sergeant Daves
Matthew Griffin v. Sergeant Daves
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6779 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/11/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6779
MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT DAVES; JOSEPH PARLIER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:19-ct-03040-M)
Submitted: February 12, 2024 Decided: March 11, 2024
Before WILKINSON, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew James Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6779 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/11/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew James Griffin appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary
judgment to the Defendants on his second amended
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint and
denying reconsideration. See Griffin v. Daves, No. 5:19-ct-03040-M (E.D.N.C. Mar. 16,
2022), ECF No. 134; Griffin v. Daves, No. 5:19-ct-03040-M (E.D.N.C. July 1, 2022), ECF
No. 143. Lacking the benefit of this Court’s decision in Griffin v. Bryant,
56 F.4th 328(4th Cir. 2022), the district court concluded that Griffin had failed to exhaust his available
administrative remedies, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 1997e(a). In light of our Bryant decision, we vacate the district court’s rulings and
remand for further proceedings that are consistent therewith. We deny Griffin’s motion to
hear the appeal on the original record.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished