U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

Tamer Escander v. Christine Wormuth

Tamer Escander v. Christine Wormuth
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2024

Tamer Escander v. Christine Wormuth

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1656 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1656

TAMER ESCANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00589-BO)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Kelly B. McClanahan, NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Michael F. Easley, Jr., United States Attorney, Sharon C. Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1656 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Tamer Escander appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Army on Escander’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e- 17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Escander v. Wormuth, No. 5:20-cv-00589-BO (E.D.N.C. June 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.