U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2024

Jerome Garcia v. A. Enzor

Jerome Garcia v. A. Enzor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2024

Jerome Garcia v. A. Enzor

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1924 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1924

JEROME GARCIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. A. K. ENZOR, State Trooper; WILLIE MCCAULEY, JR., SC Trooper, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:21-cv-01359-MGL)

Submitted: March 28, 2024 Decided: April 1, 2024

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, LINDEMANN LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1924 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jerome Garcia appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Garcia’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, dismissing the illegal search claim with prejudice, and dismissing the false arrest and imprisonment claims without prejudice pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Garcia’s motion to remand and affirm the district court’s judgment. Garcia v. Enzor, No. 3:21-cv-01359-MGL (D.S.C. Aug. 25, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.