Jovan Brown v. Ron Lawrenz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jovan Brown v. Ron Lawrenz

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6045      Doc: 15         Filed: 06/04/2024    Pg: 1 of 2




                                            UNPUBLISHED

                               UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                              No. 24-6045


        JOVAN M. BROWN,

                            Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        RON LAWRENZ; ERIC RAMOS; LISA YOUNG,

                            Defendants - Appellees.



        Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
        Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:22-cv-01705-HMH)


        Submitted: May 30, 2024                                              Decided: June 4, 2024


        Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.


        Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.


        Jovan M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Quintin Atkinson, Mark Victor Gende,
        SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.


        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6045       Doc: 15          Filed: 06/04/2024      Pg: 2 of 2




        PER CURIAM:

               Jovan M. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s September 7, 2023, order

        accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation, granting Defendants’ motion for

        summary judgment, and dismissing Brown’s 
42 U.S.C. § 1983
 action. In civil cases,

        parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an

        appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under

        Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The

        district court may reopen the time to file an appeal if: (1) the court finds that the movant

        did not receive proper notice of the entry of the judgment within 21 days after entry; (2)

        the motion to reopen the appeal period is filed within 180 days after the order is entered or

        within 14 days after the movant receives proper notice of the entry, whichever is earlier;

        and (3) the court finds that no party would be prejudiced. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6); see Fed.

        R. Civ. P. 77(d). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional

        requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 
551 U.S. 205, 214
 (2007).

               Brown asserts that he did not receive timely notice of the entry of the district court’s

        judgment. We construe his December 11, 2023, letter as a motion to reopen the appeal

        period under Rule 4(a)(6). ∗ Accordingly, we remand to the district court for the limited

        purpose of determining whether to reopen the appeal period.

                                                                                         REMANDED


               ∗
                 Because Brown filed the notice of appeal more than 30 days after the appeal period
        expired, the motion cannot be construed as a Rule 4(a)(5) motion for extension of time to
        file a notice of appeal.

                                                       2


Reference

Status
Unpublished