U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Jose Soto-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland

Jose Soto-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 7, 2025

Jose Soto-Alvarado v. Merrick Garland

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2079 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/07/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-2079

JOSE WALDEMAR SOTO-ALVARADO, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney general, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 18, 2024 Decided: January 7, 2025

Before WYNN and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Victor E. Legorreta, LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL E. ROSADO, P.C., Laurel, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Aimee J. Carmichael, Acting Assistant Director, Gregory M. Kelch, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-2079 Doc: 24 Filed: 01/07/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jose Waldemar Soto-Alvarado, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the record and Soto-Alvarado’s claims and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Soto-Alvarado (B.I.A.

Sept. 15, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.