United States v. Kenneth Matthews

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kenneth Matthews

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6380 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH RAY MATTHEWS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:95-cr-00069-AWA-1)

Submitted: November 14, 2024 Decided: January 13, 2025

Before NIEMEYER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ray Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6380 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Matthews appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

expunge his since-vacated 1995 federal firearm conviction. The district court found that it

lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion because federal ancillary jurisdiction does not

extend to motions for equitable expungement. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of

Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 379-81

(1994). The court further concluded that even if it were to

exercise ancillary jurisdiction over Matthews’s motion, his case did not satisfy the

extraordinary circumstances that this Court has held must be present in order to warrant

expungement.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Matthews’s pending motion to appoint counsel, and we affirm the district court’s order.

United States v. Matthews, No. 2:95-cr-00069-AWA-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2023). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished