Richard Warren v. Mahesh Aditya

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richard Warren v. Mahesh Aditya

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1712 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1712

RICHARD EUGENE WARREN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MAHESH ADITYA, Individually, Vice Chair Santander Holdings, et al.; SANTANDER CONSUMER HOLDINGS; BRUCE JACKSON, Individually, President Chrysler Capital; ERIC LANEY, Individually, Chief Financial Officer; CHRISTOPHER PFIRMAN, Individually, General Counsel; CHRYSLER CAPITAL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00719-DJN)

Submitted: December 17, 2024 Decided: January 13, 2025

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Eugene Warren, Appellant Pro Se. Blaec C. Croft, MCGUIREWOOD, LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1712 Doc: 19 Filed: 01/13/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Eugene Warren appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss and dismissing Warren’s second amended complaint

with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. Warren v. Aditya, No. 3:23-cv-00719-DJN (E.D. Va.

June 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished