Angela Williams v. Harmon Badge 0156
Angela Williams v. Harmon Badge 0156
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-2036 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/27/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2036
BENEFICIARY TO ANGELA T. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARMON BADGE 0156, CPL Seat Pleasant Police; CEDRIC HEYWARD, Asst Chief; MCDONALD’S TOW, Owner and Tow Driver; RUSHANE JONES, Supervisor-Prince Georges Tow Hearing Com,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (8:24-cv-01851-DLB)
Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 27, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angela T. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-2036 Doc: 9 Filed: 01/27/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Angela T. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil
action under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim
on which relief may be granted. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final
judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court
extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a
jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell,
551 U.S. 205, 214(2007).
The district court entered its order on August 22, 2024, and the appeal period expired
on September 23, 2024. Williams filed the notice of appeal on October 8, 2024. Because
Williams failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of
the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished