William Farley v. CMFG LIfe Insurance Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

William Farley v. CMFG LIfe Insurance Company

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1635

WILLIAM HARRISON FARLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CMFG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a Cuna Mutual,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Robert S. Ballou, District Judge. (6:22-cv-00024-RSB)

Submitted: January 31, 2025 Decided: February 13, 2025

Before AGEE, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Thomas E. Strelka, Brittany M. Haddox, STRELKA LAW OFFICE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Kevin D. Holden, Richmond, Virginia, John Tucker Woodson, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Madison, Wisconsin, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1635 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/13/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

William Harrison Farley appeals the district court’s order awarding summary

judgment to CMFG Life Insurance Company on Farley’s retaliatory termination claim

under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967,

29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634

. * After

a thorough review of the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we discern no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Farley v. CMFG Life

Ins. Co., No. 6:22-cv-00024-RSB (W.D. Va. May 24, 2023). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court also awarded summary judgment to the defendant on Farley’s age discrimination claim. Farley does not challenge that ruling on appeal.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished