USCA4 Appeal: 24-1999     Doc: 14        Filed: 02/24/2025   Pg: 1 of 3




                                           UNPUBLISHED

                             UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                 FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                                             No. 24-1999


        OKSANA MARINARO

                           Plaintiff - Appellant,

                     v.

        HONORABLE WILLIAM S. MOORE; HONORABLE JAMES C. LEWIS;
        HONORABLE LESLIE L. LILLEY; HONORABLE H. THOMAS PADRICK;
        HONORABLE TINA SINNEN; BRETT TIDRICK; CHERYL E. BENN, all in
        their official and individual capacity,

                           Defendants - Appellees.



        Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
        Norfolk. Elizabeth W. Hanes, District Judge. (2:24-cv-00001-EWH-LRL)


        Submitted: February 20, 2025                             Decided: February 25, 2025


        Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.


        Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


        Oksana Marinaro, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia
        Beach, Virginia; Mary Teresa Morgan, PARKER POLLARD WILTON & PEADEN,
        Virginia Beach, Virginia; Meredith Linn Yoder, PARKER, POLLARD, WILTON &
        PEADEN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1999      Doc: 14         Filed: 02/24/2025    Pg: 2 of 3




        Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.




                                                    2
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1999      Doc: 14        Filed: 02/24/2025     Pg: 3 of 3




        PER CURIAM:

               Oksana Marinaro appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 

        complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

        affirm the district court’s order. Marinaro v. Moore, No. 2:24-cv-00001-EWH-LRL (E.D.

        Va., Sept. 10, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

        contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

        not aid the decisional process.

                                                                                     AFFIRMED




                                                    3