U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Jeremy Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

Jeremy Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2025

Jeremy Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2097 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-2097

JEREMY VICKERY, Plaintiff - Appellant, and AREA WIDE ELECTRIC, Plaintiff, v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:24-cv-01918-JD)

Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2097 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Jeremy Vickery, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Clement Bruner, BRUNER, POWELL, WALL & MULLINS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2097 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/03/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Jeremy Vickery appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing without prejudice the claims of Area Wide Electric, and dismissing Vickery’s claims with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc., No. 4:24-cv-01918-JD (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.