U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Veronica Ogunsula v. Michael Warrenfeltz

Veronica Ogunsula v. Michael Warrenfeltz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 6, 2025

Veronica Ogunsula v. Michael Warrenfeltz

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1845 Doc: 23 Filed: 03/06/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1845

VERONICA W. OGUNSULA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TFC MICHAEL WARRENFELTZ, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02568-ELH)

Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 6, 2025

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Veronica W. Ogunsula, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Hott, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1845 Doc: 23 Filed: 03/06/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Veronica W. Ogunsula appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Ogunsula’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ogunsula’s motions to reverse on appeal and to amend her informal brief and affirm the district court’s order. Ogunsula v. Warrenfeltz, No. 1:20-cv-02568-ELH (D. Md. July 30, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.