U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

United States v. Tyrell Saunders

United States v. Tyrell Saunders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2025

United States v. Tyrell Saunders

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6902

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRELL SAUNDERS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00242-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025

Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrell Keoni Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6902 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Tyrell Keoni Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying him a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a sentence under [18 U.S.C.] § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo.”

United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our review of the record reveals no error. The court correctly determined that Saunders was eligible for a reduction based on Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines and clearly understood its authority to reduce Saunders’s sentence but declined to grant a reduction based on its review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.