U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Dora Adkins v. Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Dora Adkins v. Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2025

Dora Adkins v. Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1017 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1017

DORA L. ADKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARK HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02280-LMB-LRV)

Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: April 1, 2025

Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dora L. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1017 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/01/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Dora L. Adkins appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to file a proposed emergency complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Adkins’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Grayson O Co. v. Agadir Int’l, LLC, 856 F.3d 307, 316 (4th Cir. 2017) (“A party waives an argument by failing to present it in its opening brief or by failing to develop its argument—even if its brief takes a passing shot at the issue.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.