United States v. Victor Perkins
United States v. Victor Perkins
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6136 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6136
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS, Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:92-hc-00654-FL)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6136 Doc: 8 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion for a procedural order, finding that Perkins must file any motions through his appointed counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Perkins, No. 5:92-hc-00654-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan.
8, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.