U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Eugene Cory Dingle v. James McGee

Eugene Cory Dingle v. James McGee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 28, 2025

Eugene Cory Dingle v. James McGee

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1133 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1133

EUGENE CORY DINGLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JUDGE JAMES G. MCGEE, of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; JUDGE WILLIAM J. WYLIE, JR., of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; JUDGE TIMOTHY H. POGUE, of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; JUDGE MICHAEL H. MURPHY, III, of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; JUDGE ANNE G. JONES, of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; LESLIE ARMSTRONG, Guardian Ad Litem of Dorchester County Family Court “individual and official capacity”; JUDGE MANDY W. KIMMONS, of Dorchester County Family Court “Individual and official capacity,” Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:23-cv-05333-BHH)

Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 28, 2025

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1133 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Eugene Cory Dingle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1133 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Eugene Cory Dingle appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Dingle’s civil complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Dingle v. Mcgee, No. 2:23- cv-05333-BHH (D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.