U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Affinity Recovery Center LLC v. Town Commissioners of Sudlersville

Affinity Recovery Center LLC v. Town Commissioners of Sudlersville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 20, 2025

Affinity Recovery Center LLC v. Town Commissioners of Sudlersville

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1078 Doc: 23 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1078

AFFINITY RECOVERY CENTER LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOWN COMMISSIONERS OF SUDLERSVILLE, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00714-LKG)

Submitted: March 5, 2025 Decided: June 20, 2025

Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: James Peters, KURTZ, PETERS & ASSOCIATES, Boca Raton, Florida, for Appellant. William C. Dickerson, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1078 Doc: 23 Filed: 06/20/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Affinity Recovery Center LLC (“Affinity”) appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on Affinity’s claims under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131- 12134, and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-19. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Affinity Recovery Ctr. LLC v. Town Comm’rs of Sudlersville, No. 1:23-cv-00714-LKG (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.