U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman

Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2025

Scott Reich v. Arnett Coleman

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6183

SCOTT RANDALL REICH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. ARNETT COLEMAN; P.A. MARK DOWNS; P.A. LEMKE; DR. CLIFTON CURTIS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-ct-03241-BO)

Submitted: July 7, 2025 Decided: July 9, 2025

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Randall Reich, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Jansen Banfield, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6183 Doc: 34 Filed: 07/09/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Scott Randall Reich seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Reich seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.