Rodney Cobbs v. Helen Pratt
Rodney Cobbs v. Helen Pratt
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6233 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6233
RODNEY E. COBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HELEN DENISE PRATT; TYISHA SELLARS; CARDIELLEA BARKSDALE; TIMOTHY NOONAN; TONYA REYNOLDS; CORPORAL MEARES; RACHEL PERRY; SAVANNAH HILL SPENCE; JEANNIE BERQ; SHARONDA BENNETT; JAMES VAUGHAN; DEBORA CETTLE; ARIKA SIDBURY; MARGARET A. HUTZENBILER; JACOB ZENTER; KIM BREEDEN; ROBERT THOMAS; RONALD KNOPF; REBECCA SIXTO; ERIC LIPPERT; EMILY G.
LANKLER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-ct-03165-M-RJ)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney E. Cobbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6233 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Rodney E. Cobbs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Cobbs v. Pratt, No. 5:24-ct-03165-M-RJ (E.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.