Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1524 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1524
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, Plaintiff - Appellant, and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, (USPTO); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, (GSFC); AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, (AIP); KENNEDY SPACE CENTER; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, (NSF), Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (1:25-cv-00102-MOC-WCM)
Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1524 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1524 Doc: 10 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number P60005535) appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determination that the complaint failed to present a coherent claim. Accordingly, we deny Emrit’s motion to transfer and affirm the district court’s judgment. Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 v. USPTO, No. 1:25-cv-00102- MOW-WCM (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.