USCA4 Appeal: 25-1523 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1523

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NUMBER P60005535, a/k/a Ronald Satish Emrit, Plaintiff - Appellant, and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, d/b/a United Emrits of America, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, (USPTO); UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER, (GSFC) in Greenbelt, Maryland; AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, (AIP); KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, in Cape Canaveral, Florida; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, (NSF), Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:25-cv-00181-M-KS)

Submitted: July 24, 2025 Decided: July 29, 2025

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1523 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 2 of 3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1523 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit (who also identifies himself as Presidential Candidate Number P60005535) seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order directing him to correct deficiencies in the initial filing of his civil complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Emrit seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Emrit’s motion to transfer and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED