Monica Macedon v. Jackie Castle
Monica Macedon v. Jackie Castle
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1382 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1382
MONICA B. MACEDON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JACKIE CASTLE, Assistant Clerk of Superior Court; THOMAS E. MCDONALD, Attorney, Brock & Scott, PLLC c/o U.S. Bank Trust N.A.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., (SPS); RANDHIR GANDHI, CEO for SPS; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; PITT COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:24-cv-00066-BO-BM)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica B. Macedon, Appellant Pro Se. Tamika Lynn Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Alan Marc Presel, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Matthew Adams Abee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Frederick Hughes Bailey, III, SUMRELL SUGG, PA, New Bern, North USCA4 Appeal: 25-1382 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1382 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Monica B. Macedon appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissing with prejudice Macedon’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Macedon v. Castle, No. 4:24-cv-00066-BO-BM (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.