USCA4 Appeal: 25-1442 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-1442

EVELYN R. SINKLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02364-MSN-LRV)

Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 25, 2025

Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se. Terrance Wayne Anderson, Jr., NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Boca Raton, Florida, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-1442 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss Sinkler’s civil action; and (2) denying her “Motion to Vacate Void Orders and Enter Default Judgment” and “Consolidated Motion for Relief From Judgment Under Rule 60(b).” On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).

We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the issues Sinkler raises in her pro se filings with this Court and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Sinkler v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-02364- MSN-LRV (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2025; Apr. 21, 2025). We grant Sinkler’s motion to submit the appeal based on her informal opening and supplemental opening briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED