Willa Pembleton v. Secretary of the Air Force
Willa Pembleton v. Secretary of the Air Force
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1565 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-1565
WILLA A. PEMBLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE; DR. TROY E. MEINK, SECAF; NAJEE CRAWFORD, Director of Human Resources; COREY DENSON; COMMANDER 20TH FW; COMMANDER 20TH FSS; FRANCIS FAPPIANO; CAPT. AMY A.
ALLGOOD; ERICA N. BROWN; JEROME C. BROWN; TANYA WYATT; CMSGT DONALD PEDRO; AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES; COMMANDER, 20TH LOGISTICS READINESS SQUADRON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:22-cv-03989-MGL)
Submitted: August 21, 2025 Decided: August 26, 2025
Before WILKINSON, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willa A. Pembleton, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer L. Mallory, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1565 Doc: 11 Filed: 08/26/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Willa A. Pembleton appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the Secretary of the Air Force, in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s determinations that Pembleton failed to exhaust her administrative remedies as to any failure-to-accommodate and termination claims and that her remaining exhausted claims failed to state a prima facie case. Accordingly, we deny Pembleton’s pending motions and affirm the district court’s order. Pembleton v. Sec’y of the Air Force, No. 3:22-cv-03989-MGL (D.S.C. Mar. 19, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.