Guy Craig v. KrunchCash, LLC
Guy Craig v. KrunchCash, LLC
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1847
GUY CRAIG; THE LAW OFFICE OF GUY M. CRAIG, LLC; RICHARD J.
HACKERMAN; MARK LEIFER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. KRUNCHCASH, LLC; GABRIEL BERG; MATTHEW S. STURTZ; NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP; KENNEDY BERG, LLP, Defendants - Appellees, and ZVI GUTTMAN, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-02200-GLR)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 2 of 3
ON BRIEF: Richard J. Hackerman, RICHARD J. HACKERMAN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Jeffrey J. Hines, David F. Shea, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1847 Doc: 37 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Guy Craig, the Law Office of Guy M. Craig, LLC, Richard J. Hackerman, and Mark Leifer appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their adversary proceeding against KrunchCash, LLC, Gabriel Berg, Kennedy Berg, Matthew Scott Sturtz, and Nelson, Mullins, Riley, & Scarborough, LLP, which they filed in the three consolidated bankruptcy cases filed by law firms operated by Jonathan and Perry Resnick. We have reviewed the record and the arguments presented on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Craig v. KrunchCash, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-02200-GLR (D. Md. July 13, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.