Andre Youngblood v. Richard Gergel
Andre Youngblood v. Richard Gergel
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6498 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6498
ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE RICHARD M. GERGEL; AMBERELLE N. WELLS; LASHEIKA S. VANDYKE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Jacquelyn Denise Austin, District Judge. (0:24-cv-06372-JDA)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 3, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Youngblood, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6498 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/03/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Andre Youngblood appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Youngblood’s amended complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). He also appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Youngblood v. Gergel, No. 0:24-cv-06372-JDA (D.S.C. May 30 & June 10, 2025). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.