U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2025

Joseph McGhee Bey v. State of North Carolina

Joseph McGhee Bey v. State of North Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2025

Joseph McGhee Bey v. State of North Carolina

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6533 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/21/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6533

JOSEPH CASEY MCGHEE BEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; PERSON COUNTY COURTS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; UNITED STATES CONGRESS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. L. Patrick Auld, Magistrate Judge. (1:25-cv-00353-WO-LPA)

Submitted: October 16, 2025 Decided: October 21, 2025

Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Casey McGhee Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6533 Doc: 20 Filed: 10/21/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Joseph Casey McGhee Bey seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s recommendation to the district court that Bey’s civil complaint be dismissed. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The magistrate judge’s recommendation is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.