Derek Williams v. Brayden Leopold
Derek Williams v. Brayden Leopold
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 25-6513 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/31/2025 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 25-6513
DEREK MARIO WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRAYDEN LEOPOLD, Greenville County Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity; HARRY MCCONNELL, Greenville County Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity; JACOB YOUNGBLOOD, Greenville County Sheriff’s Department, in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Kevin Frank McDonald, Magistrate Judge. (6:24-cv-01772-JDA)
Submitted: October 23, 2025 Decided: October 31, 2025
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek Mario Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Todd Russell Flippin, HOLCOMBE BOMAR, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6513 Doc: 22 Filed: 10/31/2025 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Derek Williams seeks to appeal the report filed by the magistrate judge
recommending that the district court deny relief on Williams’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The order Williams seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny Williams’s motion to add a declaration to his opposition to the
summary judgment motion, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished